Rule 1. Back your argument up
Rule 2. Respect other people’s work
Rule 3. Know thyself
Rule 4. Be open to other ideas
Rule 5. Stick to the point
Rule 6. Discuss
If the topic you want to address is under discussion below, please double click in the discussion thread, instead of using the Comment box.
New topic:
2010-05-13 12:08:35 Very edukational! —NormanNitram
2010-05-28 12:30:33 Perhaps you could explain what the difference between Beattie’s and Irigaray's theory about angel’s is?
That is, I am still unclear what angel's have to do with
the 'sensible transcendental', so perhaps an explanation would
help if relevant i.e., is it about angel’s appearing to restore the faith
in the possibility of a genuine mass?
It also appears to me, that separation between mind and body,
men and women or more generally reason and experience are just different sides of
a dialectical opposition. From my brief look at an article
about Irigaray's theory of the 'sensible transcendental', it appears
that the method of Plato's dialectic is not properly understood.
Perhaps it would be worth commenting on the mass being about
the truth of that which is absolute for the dialectic, as in the good
being greater than the evil (=God)?
Perhaps it is a lie to think of God being Jesus,
given what Matthew and Mark claim were Jesus’ last words on the cross;
being human simply means we can believe and live according to God's maxims?
2010-05-28 21:17:28 Not re. the above, (above my pay grade! Perig, please respond!) but just on formatting - guys, gals, can we stick to PI standards! That is, don't clutter the text with page numbers and let's use proper footnotes.
If anyone's not sure, see the META page (bottom of the left menu, where it explains how to do them. But I can repeat the method here easily enough, just use this format: 1 —NormanNitram
- 1This is the footnote text
