Recent Changes for "Differentialist sissies" - Philosophical Investigations

Differentialist sissies

PerigGouanvic — 2010-02-14 04:50:20

(quick edit)

Differences for Differentialist sissies

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 18:	Line 18:
	+ + The revolutionary program of Irigaray is not a program, it consists in ridiculing manners of thinking that she called "phallogocentric". + + Where does this leads us? To the unthinkable differnence in women's ways of experiencing life -- and to the possibility that women have been treated as the infantile, underdevelopped half of humanity. + + Most feminists are against that: women have been denied rights, dignity, existence; now is not the time to provide a reason for such barbary; why not explain the Holocaust by telling how different the Jews are? + + Not to get carried away, but it seems impossible today to talk about men / women differences as a basis for social transformation.

PerigGouanvic — 2010-02-08 21:38:29

[[include(templates/vault)]]

Differences for Differentialist sissies

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- \|\|\|\|\|\|<tablewidth="100%" align="center">http://philosophical-investigations.org/Design_tools?sendfile=true&file=littlestub.jpg [[br]] [[br]]'''YOU can help expand it.'''[[br]]''Guests are encouraged to do so primarily by adding''[[br]]''sections, not by editing the existing ones.''[[br]]More ideas, and some possible material[[br]]are on the related discussion page\|\| -	+ [[include(templates/vault)]]

PerigGouanvic — 2010-01-19 19:20:22

(quick edit)

Differences for Differentialist sissies

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- ==''Is differentialist feminism for sissies?''==	+ ==''Why is difference feminism so unpopular among feminists?''==

PerigGouanvic — 2010-01-09 06:59:41

(quick edit)

Differences for Differentialist sissies

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
- A minority of feminists (like Luce Irigaray and Julia Kristeva) are caught red handed, advocating for a difference that sends women back to nursing, cooking, cuddling and all those animal instincts.	+ A minority of feminists (like Luce Irigaray and Julia Kristeva) are caught red handed, advocating for a difference that sends (through an ultra-slippery slope) women back to nursing, cooking, cuddling and all those animal instincts.

PerigGouanvic — 2010-01-09 06:56:50

Differences for Differentialist sissies

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ \|\|\|\|\|\|<tablewidth="100%" align="center">http://philosophical-investigations.org/Design_tools?sendfile=true&file=littlestub.jpg [[br]] [[br]]'''YOU can help expand it.'''[[br]]''Guests are encouraged to do so primarily by adding''[[br]]''sections, not by editing the existing ones.''[[br]]More ideas, and some possible material[[br]]are on the related discussion page\|\| + + ==''Is differentialist feminism for sissies?''== + The vast majority of men believe that being a feminist means, or would mean, supporting Women's unique contribution to life an society. + + They believe that feminism, coming from their part, is a demonstration of love for this Other, instead of the usual domination, domestication and despise. + + Not so, for a great proportion of feminists! + + One should never talk about sex differences, unless they are ''constructed gender differences'' as is now the norm in academia. + + A minority of feminists (like Luce Irigaray and Julia Kristeva) are caught red handed, advocating for a difference that sends women back to nursing, cooking, cuddling and all those animal instincts. + + And "radical" feminists are worried and angry. Because the Men/Mars-Women/Venus discourse is gaining popularity. + + It is, supposedly, a way, through this "emotion-caring-not-able-to-read-a-map", rhetoric, to enslave women. + + Is it?