Evidence-based assessment of Evidence-Based Medicine/Talk

This page is for discussing the contents of Evidence-based assessment of Evidence-Based Medicine.

Comments:

Hmmm... I really hate acronyms - could we keep them out of page titles? They can creep in, I guess, in the apges proper, after ahving been 'introduced'.

It seems fromt eh start there that the issue is maybe more specific than the title suggests - maybe this is a case stdy and will be fed into a wider debate later? In which case, maybe it shuld be just a 'box', this page.

Re. the formatting, I think it can be improved. I'll have a go now. - NN

2009-10-18 18:49:30   Yes, a box is good. No need to format it at "width=xx%", btw, because the include macro does it.

I think we should just copy this table on a box/EBM tetanus page and continue brainstorming on this page, and hope for a proper, wider title to be found. —PerigGouanvic

2009-10-18 19:01:33   Curses! The tables do not respond to the 'width command? Where's a Jaberwokky when you need one! —NormanNitram

2009-10-18 19:17:01   see the edit history, where I changed the table width to 50%. it was done using the "tablewidth" command. —PerigGouanvic

2009-10-18 20:18:55   Ah yes, but what I was trying to do was to 'force' the middle column to be wider, the width command is supposed to do that cell by cell... only it didn't wanna co-operate! —NormanNitram

2010-06-28 20:06:17   Here we go again, now with vitamin D...

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/11180df8-beaa-11de-b4ab-00144feab49a.html —PerigGouanvic

2010-06-29 23:38:29   Sum it up for us slow readers, Perig! —docmartin