Rule 1. Back your argument up
Rule 2. Respect other people’s work
Rule 3. Know thyself
Rule 4. Be open to other ideas
Rule 5. Stick to the point
Rule 6. Discuss
If the topic you want to address is under discussion below, please double click in the discussion thread, instead of using the Comment box.
New topic:
2010-02-07 05:21:14 removed:
This follows the same logic as discussions on race.
An example: If I tell you that North American Natives differentiated between "real Whites" and others. The real whites were of French origins, the others were the Yankees, but let's leave the details to another investigation (link to "Why are/were the French colons called the "real whites" by Native Americans?").
You will probably be curious to know why the French, who mostly survive in Quebec, today, were not seen as genocidal to the Indians.
You won't perhaps realize that you are entering in a forbidden rhetoric, a racist rhetoric. You are stating or taking for granted, that the 3 centuries of English and American domination that followed the century of French domination were essentially different because the Anglo worldview, this race's view, is necessarily wicked.
How about an investigation of this, sometime? - DM
2010-02-07 06:20:22 Doc, or was it you Norman,
I used one of the proposed table templates you were not sure they'd be useful. Colors aside, I find it is a nice concept (see page, you can not miss it the colors are fluo!) —PerigGouanvic
2010-02-07 21:26:53 Ows that? —docmartin
2010-02-08 00:24:01 great, as always - thanks! —PerigGouanvic
