Rule 1. Back your argument up
Rule 2. Respect other people’s work
Rule 3. Know thyself
Rule 4. Be open to other ideas
Rule 5. Stick to the point
Rule 6. Discuss
If the topic you want to address is under discussion below, please double click in the discussion thread, instead of using the Comment box.
New topic:
2010-01-17 21:27:09 Bonjour à tous! —AndreBriton
2010-01-18 00:36:24 Bonjour, André!
I should get P-A to help with this really... —NormanNitram
- but I can't stop myself!
2010-01-19 22:00:19 Please can I have the page added to the live list —AndreBriton
2010-01-19 23:16:55 There you go André! —PerigGouanvic
2010-01-22 18:58:27 May I just congratulate André on his page design —docmartin
2010-01-28 18:13:40 Hello, I'd like to clarify something, I did not translate "Les Mots et Les Images" into English. My French is not that good! I copied the text from a display at the new Magritte Museum in Brussels. There was a small document folded accordion style with similar images as shown here(if not the same)and corresponding text in English next to them. If photography was allowed in the museum I would have posted photos. The museum itself is excellent and full of beautiful paintings, interesting documents, and photographs that Magritte took of family and friends. I highly recommend it.
krask@kraskland.com —80.201.50.26
2010-04-06 19:32:04 I vote we delete this page - much too orignal and arty as well. Hate it! —NormanNitram
WP style voting starts here. I'll abide by the majority view.
WP-style suggestion: shouldn't we decide to put it the Vault or not? — PG
I strongly oppose the insult to my page! Rather than deleted It should be put in the valut to protect it from philistines - AB
Yes, to the Vault. Same with Norman unless Citiizendium needs him!
- DM
Hold on guys, I've canvassed some extra views - NN
-
Speedy Delete G5 (author banned). So tagged. —Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:51, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Non-notable label. References only qualify as primary. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 22:01, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
-
Delete - I am unable to find significant coverage in reliable independent sources for this record label. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
-
Delete - Unable to find WP:RS coverage to establish WP:N. Additionally, WP:MUSIC defines a notable independent record label as, "an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable" - which this does not appear to pass either. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Non notable. DimaG (talk) 21:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
-
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
-
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
-
Delete. Being a famous artist does not make someone notable. StAnselm (talk) 01:09, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
-
Delete No significant coverage in secondary sources. —Bejnar (talk) 06:17, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
-
Delete - not notable —Sodabottle (talk) 18:32, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Original research, unverified, unlikely to become verifiable or terribly notable. Jisakujien (talk) 19:09, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete: This seems to be original research on a topic that has no notability or verifiability. Babylonian Armor (talk) 19:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
-
Delete, I couldn't find any decent references in an admitted brief search. —Nuujinn (talk) 22:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
2010-04-15 20:13:44 Despite 'winning the argument', I am being magnaminous... it goes in the vaulty. —NormanNitram
