Paradise engineering

EditEdit InfoInfo TalkTalk
Search:    
http://philosophical-investigations.org/Design_tools?sendfile=true&file=littlestub.jpg

YOU can help expand it.
Guests are encouraged to do so primarily by adding
sections, not by editing the existing ones.
More ideas, and some possible material
are on the related discussion page

Which way to the elimination of suffering?

It was predictable: with every new social organization comes a new way to conceive of a golden age where its promises will be fulfilled. The neo-positivist era is no exception.

The abolitionists — who pompously baptize themselves as such without any explicit references to the preceding abolitionists, who wanted to eliminate slavery — are the most vehemently utopic ideologs of modern scientism that have come from the mills of Oxford. Before we advance further in their (u/dys)-topia, let's pause and reflect on the issue of slavery, to which they owe their name.

Yet, how many slaves remain today?

slavery.jpg
[WWW]Disposable People

A Brief History of Slavery
Another historical constant is the use of slaves, be they slaves from birth, from conquest or whatever. Aristotle and Plato both produced justifications for slavery centred on the lower abilities of slaves, seen as more akin to animals. Both Christianity and Islam have been apologists for the practice despite Mohammed setting free his own slaves and instructing that all men should be brothers and treated as equals. (Well, that's half the human race freed, anyway.)

Today we find churches spearheading social change, calling for civil rights, the protection of unborn children, an end to human rights abuses in other countries, etc. This has not always been the case. It has often been said that on issues such as women's rights and human slavery, religion has impeded social progress. The church of the past never considered slavery to be a moral evil. The Protestant churches of Virginia, South Carolina, and other southern states actually passed resolutions in favour of the human slave traffic. Human slavery was called 'by Divine Appointment', 'a Divine institution', 'not immoral' but 'founded in right'. Typical of this was one Buckner H. Payne, styling himself 'Ariel', who wrote in 1867 that 'the tempter in the Garden of Eden... was a beast, a talking beast... the negro'.

Many New Testament verses call for obedience and subservience on the part of slaves, (Colossians 3:22 - 25; Ephesians 6:5 - 9; I Peter 2:18 - 25; Titus 2:9 - 10; I Timothy 6:1 - 2) and were used to justify human slavery. Many of Jesus' parables refer to slaves whilst Paul's infamous epistle to Philemon concerns a runaway slave who he unambiguously states should be returned to his master. Other than Deuteronomy, in the Old Testament, which says 'You shall not surrender to his master a slave who has taken refuge with you.' the abolitionist had to find non-Biblical sources to argue the immoral nature of slavery, a cautionary tale for those who take their lead from religion.[[br]
]Actually, Europeans have not only been slave traders, perhaps a million of them were slaves too. During the medieval period, Islamic pirates in the Mediterranean used to raid the coasts of Italy and Greece in particular, capturing 'Christians' who were then worried as slaves in North Africa. Unlike the European version of slavery though, the slaves were considered as 'fully human' and it was both possible and intended that these prisoners might be freed after payment of a suitable sum to their new owners.

And slavery is by no means merely an historical phenomenon. For example, in 2005, in Niger alone, there were officially 43 000 slaves. They were descendants of prisoners taken during wars, and were obliged to wear bracelets indicating themselves as such. As well as of course working for their masters for nothing, they were often castrated or told who they were to marry, and families were split up at the owners' whim. They ate only the 'left overs'. Naturally their children became slaves too.

Secondary source: 101 Ethical Dilemmas, by Martin Cohen, 2nd ed. 2007
According to the definition of slavery used by Kevin Bales of Free the Slaves (FTS), an advocacy group linked with Anti-Slavery International, there were 27 million people (although some put the number as high as 200 million) who worked in virtual slavery in 2007, spread all over the world. 1

Surely, Nick Bostrom and David Pearce, the two main abolitionist divas of our times, will sing song of freedom from some kind of oppression, that will speak truth to power!
paradise.jpgHow our descendants will rewrite the vertebrate genome, redesign the global ecosystem, and abolish suffering throughout the living world. (sic)

This filthy genome

So there we are, with the broadest eugenist project ever! How are we going to get rid of pain? What is pain?
For Pearce, a good example of a neurochemically corrected human being is an hyperdopaminergic person.2 Says Pearce: "it's worth recalling that happier people - and especially hyperdopaminergic people - are typically responsive to a broader range of potentially rewarding stimuli than depressives: they engage in more exploratory behaviour."

'Exploratory behaviour'?

Exploratory behaviour is a term borrowed from the vocabulary of animal experiments. Lab scientists don't study the inner life of rats (in part because they don't care, in part because they don't perceive that it might exist). Often, they will disingenuously say that those animals who are less exploratory are 'shy'!
...

Anesthesia

The most important invention in the past two thousand years is anesthesia. by Stuart Hameroff

Have you ever had surgery? If so, either a) part of your body was temporarily "deadened" by "local" anesthesia, or b) you "went to sleep" with general anesthesia. Can you imagine having surgery, or needing surgery, or even possibly needing surgery without the prospect of anesthesia? And beyond the agony-sparing factor is an extra added feature — understanding the mechanism of anesthesia is our best path to understanding consciousness.

Anesthesia grew from humble beginnings. Inca shamans performing trephinations (drilling holes in patients' skulls to let out evil humors) chewed coca leaves and spat into the wound, effecting local anesthesia. The systemic effects of cocaine were studied by Sigmund Freud, but cocaine's use as a local anesthetic in surgery is credited to Austrian ophthalmologist Karl Koller who in 1884 used liquid cocaine to temporarily numb the eye. Since then dozens of local anesthetic compounds have been developed and utilized in liquid solution to temporarily block nerve conduction from peripheral nerves and/or spinal cord. The local anesthetic molecules bind specifically on sodium channel proteins in axonal membranes of neurons near the injection site, with essentially no effects on the brain.

On the other hand general anesthetic molecules are gases which do act on the brain in a remarkable fashion — the phenomenon of consciousness is erased completely while other brain activities continue.

General anesthesia by inhalation developed in the 1840's, involving two gases used previously as intoxicants. Soporific effects of diethyl ether ("sweet vitriol") had been known since the 14th century, and nitrous oxide ("laughing gas") was synthesized by Joseph Priestley in 1772. In 1842 Crawford Long, a Georgia physician with apparent personal knowledge of "ether frolics" successfully administered diethyl ether to James W. Venable for removal of a neck tumor. However Long's success was not widely recognized, and it fell to dentist Horace Wells to publicly demonstrate the use of inhaled nitrous oxide for tooth extraction at the Massachusetts General Hospital in 1844. Although Wells had apparently used the technique previously with complete success, during the public demonstration the gas-containing bag was removed too soon and the patient cried out in pain. Wells was denounced as a fake, however two years later in 1846 another dentist William T.G. Morton returned to the "Mass General" and successfully used diethyl ether on patient William Abbott. Morton used the term "letheon" for his then-secret gas, but was persuaded by Boston physician/anatomist Oliver Wendell Holmes (father of the Supreme Court Justice) to use the term anesthesia.

Although its use became increasingly popular, general anesthesia remained an inexact art with frequent deaths due to overdose and effects on breathing until after World War II. Hard lessons were learned following the attack on Pearl Harbor — anesthetic doses easily tolerated by healthy patients had tragic consequences on those in shock due to blood loss. Advent of the endotracheal tube (allowing easy inhalation/exhalation and protection of the lungs from stomach contents), anesthesia gas machines, safer anesthetic drugs and direct monitoring of heart, lungs, kidneys and other organ systems have made modern anesthesia extremely safe. However one mystery remains. Exactly how do anesthetic gases work? The answer may well illuminate the grand mystery of consciousness.

Inhaled anesthetic gas molecules travel through the lungs and blood to the brain. Barely soluble in water/blood, anesthetics are highly soluble in a particular lipid-like environment akin to olive oil. It turns out the brain is loaded with such stuff, both in lipid membranes and tiny water-free ("hydrophobic") lipid-like pockets within certain brain proteins. To make a long story short, Nicholas Franks and William Lieb at Imperial College in London showed in a series of articles in the 1980's that anesthetics act primarily in these tiny hydrophobic pockets in several types of brain proteins. The anesthetic binding is extremely weak and the pockets are only 1 /50 of each protein's volume, so it's unclear why such seemingly minimal interactions should have significant effects. Franks and Lieb suggested the mere presence of one anesthetic molecule per pocket per protein prevents the protein from changing shape to do its job. However subsequent evidence showed that certain other gas molecules could occupy the same pockets and not cause anesthesia (and in fact cause excitation or convulsions). Anesthetic molecules just "being there" can't account for anesthesia. Some natural process critical to consciousness and perturbed by anesthetics must be happening in the pockets. What could that be?

Anesthetic gases dissolve in hydrophobic pockets by extremely weak quantum mechanical forces known as London dispersion forces. The weak binding accounts for easy reversibility - as the anesthetic gas flow is turned off, concentrations drop in the breathing circuit and blood, anesthetic molecules are gently sucked out of the pockets and the patient wakes up. Weak but influential quantum London forces also occur in the hydrophobic pockets in the absence of anesthetics and govern normal protein movement and shape. A logical conclusion is that anesthetics perturb normally occurring quantum effects in hydrophobic pockets of brain proteins.

The quantum nature of the critical effects of anesthesia may be a significant clue. Several current consciousness theories propose systemic quantum states in the brain, and as consciousness has historically been perceived as the contemporary vanguard of information processing (J.B.'s "technology = new perception") the advent of quantum computers will inevitably cast the mind as a quantum process. The mechanism of anesthesia suggests such a comparison will be more than mere metaphor.

[WWW]http://www.edge.org/documents/Invention.html

STUART HAMEROFF, M.D. is Professor, Departments of Anesthesiology and Psychology, University of Arizonan 1996. He is coeditor of Toward a Science of Consciousness : The First Tucson Discussions and Debates and Toward a Science of Consciousness II: The Second Tucson Discussions and Debates.

Others

Also see ["cure-evil-mirror-neurons | Are we about to cure evil? Humanity in the mirror — neurons]
One could perceive paradise as an inherently collective or interpersonal experience. At least that's a component of it, for most cultures before neo-positivism! However, these men, unable to tackle the issue of oppression (they're too close to it to see it, presumably), absorbed in the clarity of their mental systems3 these ["British Science Fascists] rather see as the personal experience of being neurologically (but not collectively) rewired.
...

This is a Wiki Spot wiki. Wiki Spot is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization that helps communities collaborate via wikis.