Recent Changes for "The Coincidence of Civilisation" - Philosophical Investigations

The Coincidence of Civilisation

PerigGouanvic — 2010-02-08 21:40:16

[[include(templates/vault)]]

Differences for The Coincidence of Civilisation

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- [[include(templates/stub)]]	+ [[include(templates/vault)]]

The Coincidence of Civilisation

PerigGouanvic — 2010-01-24 05:06:04

Differences for The Coincidence of Civilisation

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 30:	Line 30:
- If, like so many inventors, poets and believers claim, ideas dawn upon individuals that have the proper state of mind, the picture of the world seems to be turned upside down, with humans being the result of Ideas, not ideas being the result of Human thought processes.[[footnote(I found that the issue can be approached cautiously. Feel free, however, to [http://philosophical-investigations.wikidot.com/forum/t-134540/can-civilization-be-based-on-a-coincidence#post-469722 stop me] whenever I seem to leap too far. ''["pierre-alain-gouanvic \| Perig]'')]]	+ If, like so many inventors, poets and believers claim, ideas dawn upon individuals that have the proper state of mind, the picture of the world seems to be turned upside down, with humans being the result of Ideas, not ideas being the result of Human thought processes.

The Coincidence of Civilisation

PerigGouanvic — 2010-01-23 23:37:46

stub template

Differences for The Coincidence of Civilisation

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ [[include(templates/stub)]]
Line 2:	Line 3:
- -->'' - ''This page is a stub. You can help expand it. - Ideas, and some possible material, for the page - are on the related discussion page.'' - ''<--	+

The Coincidence of Civilisation

PerigGouanvic — 2009-08-30 21:13:54

(quick edit)

Differences for The Coincidence of Civilisation

No differences found!

The Coincidence of Civilisation

PerigGouanvic — 2009-08-30 21:13:48

Upload of image Jaspers.jpg.

The Coincidence of Civilisation

PerigGouanvic — 2009-08-30 21:13:38

(quick edit)

Differences for The Coincidence of Civilisation

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- [[fimage(Jaspers.jpg, thumbnail, left, 200)]]Karl Jaspers, a German philosopher and psychiatrist from the early XX^^th^^ century, is said to have been the first thinker to formally assert that founding events in the History of different and separated civilizations happened in an extraordinarily synchronistic way. He termed this period in History the '''Axial Age'''.	+ [[image(Jaspers.jpg, thumbnail, left, 200)]]Karl Jaspers, a German philosopher and psychiatrist from the early XX^^th^^ century, is said to have been the first thinker to formally assert that founding events in the History of different and separated civilizations happened in an extraordinarily synchronistic way. He termed this period in History the '''Axial Age'''.

The Coincidence of Civilisation

PerigGouanvic — 2009-08-30 21:13:30

(quick edit)

Differences for The Coincidence of Civilisation

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 15:	Line 15:
- [[f<image Jaspers]]Karl Jaspers, a German philosopher and psychiatrist from the early XX^^th^^ century, is said to have been the first thinker to formally assert that founding events in the History of different and separated civilizations happened in an extraordinarily synchronistic way. He termed this period in History the '''Axial Age'''.	+ [[fimage(Jaspers.jpg, thumbnail, left, 200)]]Karl Jaspers, a German philosopher and psychiatrist from the early XX^^th^^ century, is said to have been the first thinker to formally assert that founding events in the History of different and separated civilizations happened in an extraordinarily synchronistic way. He termed this period in History the '''Axial Age'''.

The Coincidence of Civilisation

PerigGouanvic — 2009-08-30 21:12:58

Differences for The Coincidence of Civilisation

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ ==''Can Civilization Be Based On A Coincidence?''==
Line 6:	Line 7:
- [[f>toc]]	+ [[tableofcontents]]
Line 9:	Line 10:
- == ''Key Questions'' - - == ''Overview'' - - == ''Case studies'' - - [[footnoteblock]] - ''Can Civilization Be Based On A Coincidence?'' - -->'' - ''This page is a stub. You can help expand it. - Ideas, and some possible material, for the page - are on the related discussion page.'' - ''<-- - [[f>toc]] - ''Draft structure'' - - == ''Key Questions''	+ == ''Key Questions''==
Line 34:	Line 19:
- [[size larger]]The spiritual foundations of humanity were laid simultaneously and independently... And these are the foundations upon which humanity still subsists today.[[/size]]	+ '''The spiritual foundations of humanity were laid simultaneously and independently... And these are the foundations upon which humanity still subsists today.'''
Line 42:	Line 27:
- == ''Overview''	+ == ''Overview''==
Line 44:	Line 29:
- === Prolegomenon - [[>]] - [[size 120%]] - ''Neither a lofty degree of intelligence nor imagination nor both together	+ === Prolegomenon=== + -->''Neither a lofty degree of intelligence nor imagination nor both together
Line 49:	Line 32:
- Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart - [[/size]] - [[/>]] - A crucial clarification: if, like so many inventors, poets and believers claim, ideas dawn upon individuals that have the proper state of mind, the picture of the world seems to be turned upside down, with humans being the result of Ideas, not ideas being the result of Human thought processes.[[footnote(I found that the issue can be approached cautiously. Feel free, however, to [http://philosophical-investigations.wikidot.com/forum/t-134540/can-civilization-be-based-on-a-coincidence#post-469722 stop me] whenever I seem to leap too far. ''["pierre-alain-gouanvic \| Perig]'')]] - ==== Posing the problem	+ Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart<-- + If, like so many inventors, poets and believers claim, ideas dawn upon individuals that have the proper state of mind, the picture of the world seems to be turned upside down, with humans being the result of Ideas, not ideas being the result of Human thought processes.[[footnote(I found that the issue can be approached cautiously. Feel free, however, to [http://philosophical-investigations.wikidot.com/forum/t-134540/can-civilization-be-based-on-a-coincidence#post-469722 stop me] whenever I seem to leap too far. ''["pierre-alain-gouanvic \| Perig]'')]] + ==== Posing the problem====
Line 55:	Line 36:
- ==== History of idealism - ===== Hegel, Boehme and the mystics	+ ==== History of idealism==== + ===== Hegel, Boehme and the mystics=====

The Coincidence of Civilisation

PerigGouanvic — 2009-08-30 21:09:27

Differences for The Coincidence of Civilisation

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ -->'' + ''This page is a stub. You can help expand it. + Ideas, and some possible material, for the page + are on the related discussion page.'' + ''<-- + [[f>toc]] + ''Draft structure'' + + == ''Key Questions'' + + == ''Overview'' + + == ''Case studies'' + + [[footnoteblock]] + ''Can Civilization Be Based On A Coincidence?'' + -->'' + ''This page is a stub. You can help expand it. + Ideas, and some possible material, for the page + are on the related discussion page.'' + ''<-- + [[f>toc]] + ''Draft structure'' + + == ''Key Questions'' + In the course of a lifetime, we are all confronted with 'coincidences'. Events occur at the same time and have, or seem to have, a complementary or similar meaning, although we can't imagine a plausible cause for their joint occurrence. Surveys show that a vast majority have experienced these intellectually challenging situations. + + Most of us, however, will not spend much more time wondering about the 'How' and the 'Why' of these conjunctures of events. And it is not indeed profoundly important. But what if there was a large scale conjuncture of radically important events occurring, against all logical explanations, in different places in the world, in utterly different cultures? + + [[f<image Jaspers]]Karl Jaspers, a German philosopher and psychiatrist from the early XX^^th^^ century, is said to have been the first thinker to formally assert that founding events in the History of different and separated civilizations happened in an extraordinarily synchronistic way. He termed this period in History the '''Axial Age'''. + + Jaspers wrote in amazement: + + [[size larger]]The spiritual foundations of humanity were laid simultaneously and independently... And these are the foundations upon which humanity still subsists today.[[/size]] + + The phenomenon of ideas being discovered at about the same time by distant researchers, without any so-called 'rational' explanation for their co-occurence, is known in science. Naturalistic explanations will revolve around the hypothesis that scientific progress is roughly the same everywhere, and that the fact that two researchers can end up fighting for paternity over an idea is merely an unfortunate event. Not much to say about it: it's only a selective recollection of events. Others -- often those who are actually doing the research -- will rather say that some ideas are "in the air". + + We should be aware that it is, however, forbidden to give credence to these insights. The 'scientific consensus' is that ideas don't have an existence of their own, but that biochemical beings simply happen to come up with the same relatively synchronous findings. + + Granted that we venture into the dangerous unchartered waters of Idealism, how can we make sense of this hypothecized Axial Age, at least provisionally? + + == ''Overview'' + + === Prolegomenon + [[>]] + [[size 120%]] + ''Neither a lofty degree of intelligence nor imagination nor both together + go to the making of genius. Love, love, love, that is the soul of genius.'' + Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart + [[/size]] + [[/>]] + A crucial clarification: if, like so many inventors, poets and believers claim, ideas dawn upon individuals that have the proper state of mind, the picture of the world seems to be turned upside down, with humans being the result of Ideas, not ideas being the result of Human thought processes.[[footnote(I found that the issue can be approached cautiously. Feel free, however, to [http://philosophical-investigations.wikidot.com/forum/t-134540/can-civilization-be-based-on-a-coincidence#post-469722 stop me] whenever I seem to leap too far. ''["pierre-alain-gouanvic \| Perig]'')]] + ==== Posing the problem + Supposing that ideas have some active role in the evolution of Humans goes against the idea that we are material (genetically determined, neurologically conditioned, materially constrained) individuals. The problem with this position is that it is only a post hoc definition of the problem. Materialism will say that all that is granted is that there are atoms, molecules, and complexity. But ''who'' said that? Atoms? Molecules? Complexity? + ==== History of idealism + ===== Hegel, Boehme and the mystics