Rule 1. Back your argument up
Rule 2. Respect other people’s work
Rule 3. Know thyself
Rule 4. Be open to other ideas
Rule 5. Stick to the point
Rule 6. Discuss
If the topic you want to address is under discussion below, please insert your response there, instead of using the New Topic box.
New topic:
2009-09-12 20:38:35
How'bout the PI font?
- P —PerigGouanvic
Belatedly...! Yes, good idea. Actually this page is a bit of a 'morsel' isn' it?
A promising stub, I'd say. or a blooming morsel. Hm. Let's work on it:
'Problems' with evolution theory
2010-03-10 19:11:53 This is an interesting discussion of 'problems' with evolutionary theory. It looks pretty persuasive, in fact, to me. I'd really papreciate some comments on it though.
![[WWW]](http://wikispot.org/wiki/eggheadbeta/img/sycamore-www.png){kind=small}
http://www.newgeology.us/presentation32.html
Other things being equal, I think we should identify the key arguments and summrise them here, and this page might be a good source for a few. —docmartin
2010-03-11 05:09:33 I'd start, as I love to do, with an anomaly:
Even Charles Darwin had a glimpse of the problem in his day. He wrote in his book On the Origin of Species: "The number of intermediate varieties which have formerly existed on Earth must be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory."
THAT'S a scientist!
- Perig —PerigGouanvic
Mmmmm... that's right. Presumably lots of argumetns for why this is 'not a problem'...? - DM
2010-03-19 12:19:19 This article might be of interest in the development of the page - anyone?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/mar/19/evolution-darwin-natural-selection-genes-wrong
Me! Me!
But a little later. Epigenetics have taken an eternity to enter in the public debate because darwinian fundamentalists and anti-ID ideology (ID=Intelligent Design). Fascinating stuff, and epigenetics is not even the whole story, as non-coding areas of DNA might as well carry some information — but research is scarce in this field and speculations run wild.
—pg
I moved some research excerpts to my personal page, where they belong — they are more of a personal to-do list. sorry for that. -PG
(jargon was there...)
2010-07-17 19:44:51 You've lost me, guys! A plain text version for the page would be good, though? —docmartin 2010-11-25 21:49:06 I know this is just a talk page, but what's taht supposed to be? It's not communication... it is just jargon, Perig. It makes it look like the site has no standards... I regret it. —docmartin
2010-11-26 00:05:00 that's right. I'll take care of this. —PerigGouanvic
2010-11-26 16:43:44 Thanks Perig - reassured to know it's not my going crazy... too much computers... —docmartin
