Rule 1. Back your argument up
Rule 2. Respect other people’s work
Rule 3. Know thyself
Rule 4. Be open to other ideas
Rule 5. Stick to the point
Rule 6. Discuss
If the topic you want to address is under discussion below, please double click in the discussion thread, instead of using the Comment box.
New topic:
2010-02-24 12:54:45 Damn fine work, Doc - I thought you were against being 'neutral' though, eh?
I've added a caption to the iamges, using a morsel of text from the Noticeboard, and a legal reference mid-way. —NormanNitram
2010-02-24 12:57:29 Note that the page where "debates and skepticism" appear is page 15, on the printable version. —PerigGouanvic
— Hmm?
— PG
2010-02-24 23:44:01 Super-beau, P-A!
And now the policy box is highlighted, I thought to strenghten the text slightly. What do you say, we go live with it soon? —docmartin
2010-02-25 11:45:25 I like this page - with its bold top graphic, it is so bright and colorful - a hint of spring perhaps - the earth begins to warm at last! —AndreBriton
2010-03-01 15:22:38 Just added William Connolley detail. Interesting how the pieces all connect! —NormanNitram
2010-04-08 12:17:17 Here is another cautionary tale of 'climate experts' and their dodgy sources! Carefully researched - but hilarious too! - DM
![[WWW]](http://wikispot.org/wiki/eggheadbeta/img/sycamore-www.png){kind=small}
http://nofrakkingconsensus.blogspot.com/2010/01/greenpeace-and-nobel-winning-climate_28.html —docmartin
2010-08-19 02:35:40 Another excellent insight from scroogle.org, my new search engine (search with this: http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm):
